达人帮忙翻译下这个英文。。水晶酬谢。。谢绝机器自动翻译

hanfeng1314

Figure 8 shows the heat flux through the green roof sample calculated from the cold plate apparatus.Average heat flux values were consistent with the calculated values from the cold plate apparatus.There is an approximately 40-50% reduction in the heat flux for the green roof sample with plants compared to the sample with only substrate.This proves that plants have a significant role in reducing the heat flux through
    a green roof.For each of the samples(plants and no plants),the heat flux through the sample increases at the same time when the latent heat flux decrease,as shown in Figures 9a and 9b. Maximum and minimum heat flux values in Figure 8 do not coincide for the two experiments because each“day”did not last exactly 14 hours.Figures 9a and 9b show the latent heat flux measured by the gravimetric method using a scale.These latent heat flux values are lower than the previously shown in Figure 2 because the incoming radiation in this laboratory experiments was substantially smaller than the heat flux in the greenhouse experiments(Farzaneh,2005).Other studies have measured similar latent heat flux values as in the present study for green roof samples in a wind tunnel(Onmura,2003)and on a roof(Takebayashi et al.,2007).
     As shown in Figures 9a and 9b the latent heat flux for both samples decreased from day to day as the water resources in the substrate decreased.During the experiments,plants seem to better manage water as the latent flux does not show as large day-to-day gradients as the bare substrate sample without plants,even though the potential for  evapotranspiration is practically the same for both samples.As observed in Figure 9b,heat flux data are  missing for the first day because the instrument was not working properly.For the sample without plants,evaporation from the substrate decreased to a minimumof 10 Btu/ft2(31 W/m2)during the 6th day of testing.
    Figures 10a and 10b show the sensible(convective)heat flux for both samples.The sample with no plants had significantly higher sensible heat flux due to the high temperature recorded in the top layer of the substrate.The sensible heat flux was around 10 Btu/h ft2(31 W/m2)at the end of the first day,and increased to a value of around 22 Btu/h ft2(69 W/m2)at the end of the 6th day.The decline in sensible heat flux is due
to the fact that the amount of heat removed by latent heat was reduced by 80%,while the other heat transfer mechanisms had to increase to maintain a heat balance.

bucketlee

没啥专业知识 仅供参考

图8给出了由冷却板装置计算出来的通过绿色顶样品的热流。平均热流值与冷却板装置理论计算值相一致。有植物的绿色屋顶样本和仅有基板的比较，减小了大约百分之四十的热流。这证明植物对减小绿色屋顶的热通量具有重要作用。对于每一种样品(有植物和无植物，通过样本的热量增大，同时潜热通量减少，如图9a和9b所示。由于每“天”并不精确的为14小时，所以图8中的两次实验的最大最小热通量并不相一致。图9a和9b显示有重量法测量的潜热流并由刻度显示。室内实验输入的辐射量明显小于温室实验热通量，因此这些潜热量值较先前图2中显示的小（Farzaneh,2005）。其他研究也测得类似的潜热流值，正如同现在对在风洞中和顶部的绿色屋顶案例的研究（Takebayashi et al.,2007）。
如图9a和9b所示，当底板上水量减小到时候哦，两个例子的潜热通量一天天减少。实验当中，植物看起来能更好的保留水分，这是由于潜热通量不会像没有植物的裸板例子那么明显的天天线性递减。尽管潜在的蒸发作用对两个例子来说都是一样的。如图9b所观测，由于仪器工作不正确，第一天热通量数据丢失。对于没有植物的例子，在实验的第6天，裸板的蒸发作用减少到最小值，10 Btu/ft2(31 W/m2)。
图10a和10b显示了两个例子的对流热通量。由于顶部的底板记录的高值温度，没有植物的例子有明显搞的对流热通量。第一天，对流热通量大致为10 Btu/h ft2(31 W/m2)。在第6天结束的时候，这个值增加到大约22 Btu/h ft2(69 W/m2)。对流热通量的减少是因为被潜热移除的80%的热量，同时其他的热传递机制需要为了维持热平衡而增加。

AV_TerranDance

- -！！！！

AV_TerranDance

天文。。。

JoLiTa

讲什么实验的?

JoLiTa

这是论文吧?

ivytree

其实机器翻译的挺好

110

地址: ftp://xxoo:xxoowoyao@61.164.151.17/xx/2.mp3

hanfeng1314

...............

熊田夏树

110大神你的声音好卖萌

hanfeng1314

bucketlee 多谢啊