标题: 平西王子发声明了 [打印本页] 作者: atom 时间: 2012-9-30 13:40 标题: 平西王子发声明了 [西瓜][西瓜]在tumblr上发表声明"Personally, it is hard for me to believe the allegations that were announced against my father...Although the policies my father enacted are open to debate, the father I know is upright in his beliefs and devoted to duty"[WSJ]作者: 用户名掉包了 时间: 2012-9-30 13:42
美国人无权干涉天朝内政!作者: 官人我还要 时间: 2012-9-30 13:43
覆巢之下,岂有完卵!作者: 又打出gg了 时间: 2012-9-30 13:49
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽作者: 公子别这样 时间: 2012-9-30 13:52
噗 ..啪啪啪 自己打自己脸么...作者: 官人我还要 时间: 2012-9-30 13:56
都削藩了,还王子个鸡巴,屌丝都不如了作者: [Y.H]DearXi 时间: 2012-9-30 13:57
....屌丝不懂英文真捉鸡啊作者: faye2500 时间: 2012-9-30 14:17
可以预见平西王很快会被美分塑造成起义失败的自由民主战士了。作者: raya 时间: 2012-9-30 14:17 作者: Springsun 时间: 2012-9-30 14:22
翻译过来就是“不阔能,额不信。偶粑粑是个好粑粑。”作者: 沉默不是金 时间: 2012-9-30 14:31
替他老爹辩解,说他不相信对于他老爹的指控,他老爹一直坚持自己的信念,不过好奇为什么没提他老妈?是不是可以认为他老妈杀人的事他知道作者: 别愁BloodBrood 时间: 2012-9-30 14:40
薄瓜瓜在十一岁的时候被父母送到英国留学,由英国商人尼尔·海伍德介绍进入贵族寄宿学校哈罗公学[6]学习。2006年,薄瓜瓜进入牛津大学贝利奥尔学院[7][8]政治哲学专业。据媒体报道,入学两年后因为成绩差,被英国牛津大学劝退,后来经过英属香港末任总督彭定康等“国际公关”才转学到美国哈佛大学肯尼迪学院[9][4][10]。2009年,被大本钟奖网络公司(Big Ben Award Corporation[11])选为第一届“大本钟奖”英国十大杰出华人青年[12][13],但此奖项的公信力多受质疑[14]。
薄瓜瓜在哈佛大学校报上声称他的学费和生活来源来自他的奖学金和他母亲的当律师和作家的收入。[15]而据英国广播公司报道,薄瓜瓜英国留学之学费为大连商人徐明所支付[16]。
薄瓜瓜与中共元老陈云孙女陈晓丹,在覀藏游玩的大批亲密照,2011年在网上流传,曾令外界猜测这两位“红三代”是否已结成情侣[17]。薄瓜瓜与陈晓丹在覀藏游玩期间,至少有4辆警车在附近戒备[18]。有网民声称,二人游覀藏时享受特级待遇,全程有警车开路,浪费公共资源[19]。后来两人分手[19][20]。。
华尔街日报称,薄瓜瓜曾于2011年夜间驾驶红色法拉利来到时任美国驻华大使洪博培官邸,同其女共进晚餐[21]。2012年两会期间,薄熙来对于他儿子在外国读书还开法拉利的传言,感到“非常气愤”,称那些都是“一派胡言”,是有人向他本人和家庭泼脏水,他声称自己、儿子和夫人没有任何个人资产,对儿子在国外读书的资金问题,称一直都是全额奖学金[22]。
2012年4月24日,薄瓜瓜写电子邮件给哈佛大学校报《Harvard Crimson》上声明自己从未驾驶过法拉利,也没有去过美国驻华大使洪博培官邸。[23][24]纽约时报采访了洪博培女儿、薄瓜瓜以及当时共进晚餐的另外三人,发现有关薄瓜瓜开红色法拉利的故事细节有许多与事实不符:洪博培的女儿是由聚会组织者接去晚餐;薄的欧洲朋友与他一起乘司机开的一辆黑色奥迪参加晚餐。华尔街日报在接受纽约时报查询时称,该报坚持前述报道,并“从不讨论新闻的信息来源”。[25]作者: 国妓米兰 时间: 2012-10-4 08:31
日本朝日新闻,关于确认guagua经济来源来自当年万达老板徐明 http://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/china/AJ201210030001
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts--The newsroom of the Crimson, the daily newspaper of Harvard University, was buzzing with activity after an e-mail arrived in late April.
The message was from Bo Guagua, a Harvard student, who said he wanted to explain his side of a story that was gaining international attention at that time.
The previous month, Bo’s father, Bo Xilai, 63, was relieved of his post as secretary of the Chongqing municipal Communist Party committee. In April, the student’s mother, Gu Kailai, 53, was arrested on suspicion of murder.
Amid the scandal, Bo Guagua, 24, came under the spotlight, as his reportedly extravagant lifestyle as a student fueled speculation of illegal money transfers involving his parents.
Bo Guagua’s message, sent from his account at the Kennedy School at Harvard, read in part, "My tuition and living expenses at Harrow School, University of Oxford and Harvard University were funded exclusively by two sources--scholarships earned independently, and my mother's generosity from the savings she earned from her years as a successful lawyer and writer."
The Harvard Crimson, with a staff of about 200, printed the entire message, and the content was made available to the world over the Internet.
Benjamin Samuels, president of the Crimson, had two reporters check the accuracy of the message because it involved a subject that was of international interest.
Contact was eventually made with Bo Guagua, who confirmed he sent the message.
In the e-mail, Bo responded to rumors and criticism directed at children of high-ranking Chinese officials concerning their high-flying lives as students abroad.
Some reports said Bo rode around in a Ferrari and a Porsche.
"I have never driven a Ferrari," he wrote in the e-mail.
He also denied living an extravagant lifestyle due to the influence of his parents and pointed out that he had a good academic record ever since he began studying in Britain.
One question that has hounded Bo Guagua was how he could afford his overseas education.
A year studying at Harvard costs at least $60,000 (about 4.8 million yen). Since Bo Guagua studied abroad from the time he was in junior high school, the total expenses for his overseas education likely reached $500,000.
Bo Xilai's annual salary as secretary of the Chongqing municipal Communist Party committee was about $20,000 (about 1.6 million yen). Gu Kailai established a law firm in Beijing in 1995, but she left it in 2001.
After Bo Xilai's fall from power, rumors emerged that Xu Ming, chairman of the Dalian Shide Group, was the source of the funds that paid for Guagua's studies abroad.
Xu, 41, was the head of the conglomerate that owned the soccer club that Bo Xilai supported in the 1990s, when he was mayor of Dalian. For those reasons, Xu was on close terms with the Bo family.
The Times of London reported that in the late 1990s, before Bo Guagua attended Harrow School in London, Xu visited Britain with Gu and paid for not only Gu's travel costs but also covered Bo Guagua's education expenses.
A university professor in Beijing who has done research on corruption within the Chinese Communist Party told The Asahi Shimbun, "Xu did provide funds to the Bo family."
The professor, who requested anonymity, cited someone close to Xu.
Xu has been detained and is being questioned by Chinese authorities.
* * *
The previous installments of this series are available at:
Cambridge University has accepted £3.7m from a Chinese foundation to endow a new professorship into Development Studies. In these cash-strapped times for higher education in Britain, it is easy to think we should be cheering such developments. But in this case there is cause for grave misgivings.
You can read a full report here, but the key fact is this: the donation has been given by a completely unknown, anonymous Chinese foundation called “Chong Hua”.
Who are they? Well it’s impossible to know. Chong Hua has no website, no listed office in Britain, no record of its funding, no published list of trustees, no public mission statement. It is completely and utterly opaque. Cambridge, despite repeated requests by The Telegraph and academics within the University, refuses to shed light on who, or what, is Chong Hua.
Their spokesman says that the donation has been “scrutinised formally by the executive committee of our university council” and that “our investigation did not identify any link between this private foundation and the Chinese Government”.
That is not good enough. Having spent the last three years in China, I can report from experience that the China is chock full of foundations and companies that are impossible to fathom. Ownership, even of publicly quoted companies, is almost never clear; due diligence is virtually impossible to perform, which is why Cambridge must show transparency on this “investigation” for it to be credible.
There is another reason to demand clarity about this donation.
The don who is due to be the first recipient of the Chong Hua professorship is Peter Nolan, a well-respected China academic, who also happens to have published a book and several papers with Liu Chunhang, the son-in-law of Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister.
Mr Liu, 40, is currently the head of both the statistics and research departments at the China Bank Regulatory Commission, highly influential positions in a country where all major banks are owned by the state. Professor Nolan is also said by colleagues, including one I spoke to in China, to have taught Wen Ruchun, the daughter of Wen Jiabao.
Unfortunately, Professor Nolan won’t accept questions from the press, but since this donation emanates from a world run on the basis of guanxi – connections and favours – the need for clarity over a donation is all the more pressing.
The reality is that rising China is a highly authoritarian, state-capitalist entity whose ideological underpinning is almost diametrically opposed to that of the West. It is currently spending untold amounts of money– we can’t know how much, but like everything else in China it’s a state secret – on its "soft power", projecting an image abroad that (I can vouch from experience) is at odds with the reality at home.
The world desperately needs dialogue with China, but it must be on the level.
If China wants to come and make its case, openly, for the Beijing consensus and its development model, for its internet censorship, land grabs and extra-judicial detentions that it says are a necessary evil for growth and stability, then that should be encouraged.
But allowing unknown, undeclared Chinese entities to fund a Professorial chair of Chinese development at Cambridge is not a wise course of action.